December 20, 2000 Immigration News Update
Click for a Printable Version of this Article
Business
Immigration News Update
from True, Walsh & Miller
Congress Passes New Immigration Law
December 20, 2000
Congress Passes Major Immigration Law
Congress and the President finally reached
agreement on December 15 on a major immigration legislative package
entitled the Legal Immigration and Family Equity Act Amendments of
2000 (LIFE Act). The new law, which President Clinton is expected to
sign shortly, offers various benefits to hundreds of thousands of
immigrants. One of these provisions temporarily restores an expired
measure that permits certain out-of-status immigrants to become lawful
permanent residents here in the United States. Another restores
eligibility under the 1986 legalization law to the beneficiaries of
certain class-action lawsuits that challenged its administration.
Still others address the hardship faced by spouses and children of
U.S. citizens and lawful residents when visa backlogs delay them from
completing the immigration process. Here are highlights of the new
law:
Section 245(i) Extension
Until 1998, section 245(i) of the Immigration
and Nationality Act (INA) temporarily allowed certain non-citizens to
become permanent residents without having to leave the United States.
As background, people are generally barred from adjusting their status
in the United States if they: (1) entered without being inspected by
an Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) officer; (2) ever
worked illegally in the United States; or (3) ever failed to maintain
lawful status in this country. Instead, they must return to their home
country to process a green card application. In some cases, however,
by leaving the United States they trigger a three- or ten-year bar to
their return if they were unlawfully present in the United States for
more than six months or a year, respectively.
Congress added INA § 245(i) in 1994 to allow
people who otherwise qualified for permanent residence, but not for
adjustment of status, to be able to adjust their status in the United
States by paying a surcharge of $1,000. Congress ended § 245(i) in
late 1997, but grandfathered those who started the green card process
by January 14, 1998, even if they couldn’t complete it until later.
The LIFE Act extends INA § 245(i) from
January 14, 1998 until April 30, 2001. This means that any beneficiary
of an immigrant visa petition or labor certification application filed
before April 30, 2001 will be able to stay in the United States and
apply for adjustment of status under INA § 245(i) as long as they pay
the penalty fee of $1,000. However, for any application filed after
January 14, 1998 but before April 30, 2001, applicants must prove they
were physically in the United States on the date the LIFE Act was
enacted. Documentation of that fact will be critical.
New V Visa for Permanent Residents’ Family
Members
Under current law, permanent residents may
apply for green cards for their spouses and minor children in the
family 2A immigrant visa category. While almost 90,000 people
immigrate to the United States each year in the family 2A category,
the backlog of applications in this category continues to grow. People
from most countries have waited over four years to immigrate in this
category. The wait for Mexicans has been six years, and new applicants
will wait longer. Because these relatives are intending immigrants
they can’t qualify to come to the United States as visitors even for
a short time while awaiting their green cards. And if they are already
here they run the risk of removal.
The LIFE Act creates a new "V"
temporary visa category designed to remedy this problem. To qualify
for a V visa, the sponsoring permanent resident must already have
filed a green card petition for his or her spouse or minor child with
the INS as of the date the LIFE Act was enacted. The petition must
either have been pending with the INS for three years or more or, if
it was approved, the spouse or minor child must have been waiting
their turn in the green card line at least three years.
The new law does not set a time limit for
people in V nonimmigrant status. The thinking appears to be that they
may remain in the United States until their immigrant visa petition is
approved. During that time they may work.
The LIFE Act waives certain grounds of
inadmissibility for V nonimmigrants, including periods of unlawful
presence in the United States. And they should be able to adjust their
status to permanent residence under the newly reinstated § 245(i).
While enactment of the V visa recognizes the
need to provide relief to people in long immigration backlogs, it is
available only to family members for whom an application has been
filed as of the date of enactment. Future applicants are ineligible.
Further, the V visa is only available to beneficiaries in the family
2A category. It is unavailable to all other family members, including
unmarried sons and daughters of U.S. citizens (family 1st category) or
unmarried sons and daughters (21 years of age and older) of green card
holders (family 2B category), many of whom have "aged-out"
of the family 2A category because of processing delays. Married sons
and daughters (family 3rd category) and brothers and sisters of U.S.
citizens (family 4th category) also are not covered.
Expanded K Visa for Spouses and Children of
U.S. Citizens
The current INA allows U.S. citizens to
petition to bring their spouses, children and parents to the United
States in the "immediate relative" category. Unlike other
family-sponsored immigrant visa categories, the immediate relative
category has no annual cap on the number of people who can immigrate
this way. But it can still take up to a year to enter the country in
this category because of processing delays. During that time, those
relatives, because they are intending immigrants, may find it hard to
gain admission to the United States even for short visits.
To remedy this problem the LIFE Act expands
the existing K nonimmigrant visa category. Until now that category has
been limited to fiancé(e)s of U.S. citizens who enter the country and
get married within 90 days. The LIFE Act expands the K category to
spouses of U.S. citizens who are already married and are waiting
outside of the United States for the approval of their immigrant visa
petitions. Any minor children who are accompanying the spouse can be
included in the K petition.
To qualify for the revised K visa category,
the U.S. citizen spouse must have filed a K visa petition in the
United States. The K visa must be issued by a U.S. consular officer
overseas. There is no provision to adjust status for someone already
in the United States in an unlawful status. If the marriage to the
U.S. citizen occurred outside of the United States, the K visa
recipient must have a valid nonimmigrant visa issued by the consulate
where the marriage occurred.
The changes mean that spouses and minor
children of U.S. citizens will be able to wait in the United States
while their green card applications are pending. They may also work
while they are waiting.
This change may not be as beneficial as it may
appear at first glance. The INS must still approve a K visa petition
and a consular officer must issue the visa before a spouse or
child(ren) may enter the United States. That can take several months.
Moreover, K visa processing may slow down considerably if many people
apply to take advantage of this new provision. It remains to be seen
if this provision significantly helps to remedy the current problem.
Conclusion
The LIFE Act offers new hope and opportunities
for many people, especially those who now may be able to become
permanent residents in the United States through the temporary
restoration of INA § 245(i). The April 30 deadline, however, will put
a premium on speed and collecting the right documentation.
As with any new law, many ambiguities lurk in
the statutory language. Call or email us if you would like a
consultation to discuss your immigration options.
_________
That’s it for this issue. For answers to any
of your immigration questions, contact Hilary Fraser (htf@millermayer.com),
Rosie Mayer (rma@millermayer.com), or
Steve Yale-Loehr (syl@millermayer.com)
at True, Walsh & Miller.